Brand Purpose: When Companies Pretend They Have a Soul

Sometime around 2010, a consensus formed in the marketing industry that brands needed to stand for something beyond their products. Not just to sell things, but to make the world better. To have a purpose. The purpose economy was born, and with it a genre of brand communication that has since spread across virtually every category, size, and type of company: the purpose statement, the manifesto, the brand purpose campaign, the corporate values wall. All of it in service of the same project: convincing the market that the company in question is not merely a commercial enterprise but a force for good in the world. Some of it is genuine. Most of it is a sophisticated form of marketing that has been mistaken — by its authors as much as its audiences — for something else.

The brand purpose movement started with real insight. Research consistently showed that consumers — especially younger consumers — preferred brands that had values, that stood for something, that seemed to care about something beyond quarterly earnings. The purpose positioning was a response to a real shift in consumer expectations. The problem is that responding to consumer expectations with a purpose isn’t the same as actually having one. And the gap between the two is where most brand purpose activity lives.

The Purpose Statement as Corporate Aspiration Fiction

The brand purpose statement is a sentence — sometimes two — that articulates what the company believes it exists to do beyond making money. “To inspire and nurture the human spirit.” “To accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.” “To give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together.” These statements range from genuinely ambitious to comically vague, but they share a characteristic that matters: they describe an aspiration, not a reality. They say what the company would like to be, or would like to be perceived as, not what the company actually is.

This gap — between the purpose as stated and the company as operated — is the original sin of the purpose marketing era. A company that has a purpose statement about human connection and simultaneously employs a content moderation system that it knows amplifies outrage and division is not a purpose-driven company. It’s a company with a purpose statement. A company that claims to be on a mission to improve health and simultaneously lobbies against nutritional labeling regulation is not purpose-driven. It’s purpose-performed. The statement exists in the marketing department. The actual purpose — generate returns for shareholders — exists everywhere else.

The Purpose Campaign and the Evidence Test

The purpose campaign — the brand film about values, the social media commitment to a cause, the partnership with an NGO — can be evaluated against a simple evidentiary test: is there organizational evidence, outside the marketing department, that this purpose is real? Does the supply chain reflect it? Do the employment practices reflect it? Do the lobbying activities reflect it? Do the product decisions reflect it?

Most purpose campaigns fail this test immediately. The brand that launches a campaign about female empowerment while paying women in its supply chain poverty wages is not demonstrating purpose; it’s demonstrating that the marketing department operates independently of the rest of the company. This is the structural condition that makes purpose washing possible: when marketing can articulate values that the organization doesn’t actually hold or practice, the purpose campaign is available as a tool regardless of whether purpose exists.

As we’ve argued about rebranding in our post on companies that change their logo instead of their problems, the signal without the substance is not communication — it’s noise that erodes trust over time. Purpose marketing that isn’t backed by organizational reality doesn’t just fail to build brand equity; it actively destroys it with the audiences sophisticated enough to notice the gap.

When Purpose Is Real

This is not a blanket indictment of purpose as a concept in brand strategy. Some companies have genuine, operational commitments to something beyond profit that inform real organizational decisions — supply chain choices, employment practices, product development priorities, political positions — and their brand communication is an honest reflection of those commitments. Those companies don’t need a purpose campaign; they have a purpose, and their communication is simply an accurate description of what they do.

The difference between purpose-as-marketing and purpose-as-operation is visible in the decisions companies make when purpose costs something. The purpose-operated company that declines a profitable business opportunity because it conflicts with their stated values is demonstrating real purpose. The purpose-marketed company that declines nothing, changes nothing, and sacrifices nothing has a values document and a brand film. These are not equivalent.

What to Do With the Purpose Brief

If you’re a creative or agency receiving a brief to develop purpose communication for a client, the most professionally useful thing you can do is ask the evidentiary questions before producing anything. What organizational evidence exists that this purpose is operational rather than aspirational? What decisions has the company made that it wouldn’t have made without this purpose? What has it given up or declined because it conflicted with this purpose?

If the answers are strong, the purpose communication has something real to reflect and will be stronger for it. If the answers are weak or absent, you have a choice: produce communication that will ring hollow to every audience member sophisticated enough to notice the gap, or have the conversation with the client about what it would actually take to make the purpose real before trying to communicate it. As we’ve argued about saying no and writing honest briefs, the most valuable thing any creative professional can offer is the willingness to have the honest conversation before the work starts rather than after it fails.

Working on a purpose campaign for a company whose purpose is, demonstrably, making money? Our shop has what you need to get through the week. No manifesto required.

Related Articles

Stock Photography and the Quiet Death of Creative Ambition

Stock Photography and the Quiet Death of Creative Ambition

There is a visual language that has colonized corporate communication so completely that most people no longer notice it. It speaks in images of diverse groups smiling at laptops, handshakes in glass-walled conference rooms, young professionals pointing at whiteboards...

How to Present Creative Work Without Apologizing for It

How to Present Creative Work Without Apologizing for It

There is a body language, a verbal register, and a set of phrases that are unique to creative presentations — and they are almost uniformly self-sabotaging. The qualifier before the work is shown: "It's still a rough idea, but..." The apology for a brave decision: "We...

0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop